| |
|
Simulation Offer Questions and Answers
LEADERSHIP

Good leadership takes advantage of people's
uniqueness to provide
a competitive edge:
|
Optimizing a Plan: |
 |
|
How to optimize
your project plan in a
day?
|
| Go to ..
Optimize |
| Leadership Style: |
 |
|
Is your leadership style
hindering you?
|
| Go to ..
Advantage |
|
Direction for Leaders: |
 |
|
How to determine leadership
quality?
|
| Go to ..
Compass |
|
|
|
|
How on earth can you do
this analysis with only
6 questions? |
|
Answer |
|
|
Who is best to answer
the 6 questions within
the organization and can
it be a team effort? |
|
Answer |
|
|
Why hasn’t my
organization found these
answers already? |
|
Answer |
|
|
How can I reduce my
cost-to-produce, thereby
increase my profit
margin by using this
analysis? |
|
Answer |
|
|
How can I improve my
time-to-market or
increase sales by this
analysis? |
|
Answer |
|
|
How can I win more bids
by using this analysis? |
|
Answer |
|
|
How successful has this
approach been with other
companies? |
|
Answer |
|
|
How on earth can you do this analysis with only 6 questions?
- We take your six responses and through the simulation, extrapolate
them into thousands of variables and millions of pieces of data
which are analyzed to specifically discover bottlenecks associated with
increasing profit margin, reducing time-to-market or winning more
contracts.
- The 6 questions, each building upon the next, gives our simulation
the essential information to do a 3-D interpretation, based on over 900
business principles (using Artificial Intelligence heuristics) described by over 40 of the
leading management consultants and executive coaches in the world. Their best practices
discussions of achieving greater levels of customer focus, establishing effective business
structures, catalyzing team dynamics, and capitalizing on employee
strengths are the foundation of this analysis and the design of the 6
questions.
- The analysis results are still conditioned on
“filling in the blanks” accurately. There will be
assumptions that are made associated with the analysis. The saying, “garbage in, garbage out” still applies. However, we will allow you to
review our assumptions before we run the simulation.
- This is a time consuming, rigorous computer analysis. The responses
you send us are entered in layers within the simulation. Each layer is
correlated with the next, creating exponentially greater detail and
analytic accuracy. Our goal is that you are so impressed with the
results that you decide to take
the simulation to the next level in terms of personal value by reviewing
the assumptions, making any adjustments, and validating the
quality of your own 6 answers.
- Contact us to receive
your 6 key questions - it's straightforward and eye-opening!
Who is best to answer the 6 Questions within
the organization and can it be a team effort?
- Managers and their staff would find great value in answering the
questions together. It’s revealing and valuable to compare different
points of views regarding these various customer-focused questions.
Additionally, it could significantly add to the quality and accuracy of
each answer.
- The best person (or group) to answer the questionnaire is based on the “success” goals. If the goal is to increase profits, logically managers with P&L responsibility would have the most to gain in answering the six questions and discovering the “ah-ha’s” in the analysis. If reducing time-to-market is the goal, then someone who manages a team working on a product release would find the results of the simulation extremely valuable. And if winning more contracts is important, then we recommend having that person responsible for bid submission answer the questions and reap the rewards.
- In all cases, the ideal people to answer the six questions are those that (1) understand their success criteria, (2) the challenges associated with managing people to achieve that criteria, and (3) want to discover any “low hanging fruit” that will give them more opportunities to succeed.
- Contact us to receive
your 6 key questions - it's straightforward and eye-opening!
Why hasn’t my organization found these answers already?
- SOUL gives an unique perspective to your organizational dynamics
versus your current problem solving approach. It knows how to precisely
translate business goals associated with time and money into people
factors, like capability and motivation. When you combine these
proprietary SOUL translation algorithms with the power of a Monte Carlo statistical
approach using
Average Performance Range and Index (APRI) mathematics, we are able to
uniquely and accurately model
hundreds of variations of your organization's dynamics to
discover missed issues that are eating into your profits, adding extra time
to your schedule or limiting your bid from being more competitive.
- Because of SOUL, the simulation analysis can correlate all three dimensions,
investigating all aspects of your organization, from customer focus to
employee productivity, leaving no variations untouched, With this type
of rigor, detail and repetition, "ah-has" emerge and and "low hanging fruit"
become easily identified. This type of rigor is why computers were made
and is what the SOUL problem solving methodology was designed to
accomplish.
- Using SOUL, the simulation is able to take on an added dimension of
modeling people's decisions and reactions to situations
that focus around each customer deliverable. By viewing these variables with a
SOUL perspective, “low hanging fruit” associated with issues affecting
financial bottlenecks, schedule delays or process efficiencies sometimes become very apparent
- almost obvious. The simulation
specializes in managing all 3-dimensions and their related variables,
along with all the variations that are possible given the parameter
defined from the responses to the 6 questions and the assumptions made.
- Contact us to receive
your 6 key questions - it's straightforward and eye-opening!
How can I reduce my cost-to-produce, thereby increase my profit margin
by using this analysis?
- This analysis will identify “low hanging fruit” associated with your
team's problem solving capability that can affect the
production cost for that deliverable you’ve listed. Yet, it’s really up
to you to know how, if the cost of delivering that product or service
were reduced, your business would benefit in terms of increased profit.
- The Monte Carlo simulation puts your people in the center of the
equation to identify “low hanging fruit.” It’s your people that are best
at determining how to reduce the cost of a deliverable. The simulation
will determine if there is an opportunity for your people to make this
determination, and what leadership approach you might consider to make
it happen.
- There are three keys to ensuring your cost-to-produce is at its
lowest, and it doesn’t directly deal with being more efficient.
Efficiency could be a result, but it’s certainly not the cause in this
case. The simulation, based on the results, could highlight three areas
to support a lower cost-to-product:
- Whether the team assigned to the product or service
is prepared,
- Whether the team can handle the unexpected (a
certainty when new processes are rolled out)
- Whether a team, when faced with a challenge, can they
lead themselves as peers.
How can I improve my time-to-market or increase sales by using
this analysis?
- There are two ways to increase time-to-market, and they need to be
addressed in this order.
- First, it’s important that when you set a release delivery or
release date, that the date is achieved reliably.
- The second method, once a reliable date can be achieved, is by
challenging your staff to determine how to reliably reduce your
time-to-market process.
- Most skip the first
issue of reliability and
go straight to time
reduction. Yet, the
second method deals with
reliably. Why reduce or
cut anything from an
unstable process
(stability as equated to
reliability). The Monte
Carlo simulation
provides a what-if
analysis for both
approaches. You get to
decide which approach
gets analyzed based on
your answers to the six
questions.
- The key to steadfast
reliability is having a
staff that is experienced,
skilled and motivated. A
reliable time-to-market date
gives a sales team an
advantage with promising
their customers value, as
does a “first to the market”
capability. The Monte Carlo
simulation will identify the
“low hanging fruit” that
might be limiting a team’s
reliability in meeting a
deadline reliably.
- In the simulation, there
will be an assumption made
by the Catalyst Technologies
team regarding Average
Performance Range and Index
(APRI) that you might want
to review as a precondition.
APRI Lambda levels are
always set to 3 when first
analyzing an organization.
If you want special
considerations, please let
us know.
-
Contact us to receive
your 6 key questions -
it's straightforward and
eye-opening!
How can I win more bids by
using this analysis?
- Cost and quality are big factors in any bid review and award. The
simulation can show how to “do more with less” which wins contracts. The
best part of this simulation approach, since it incorporates
people/leadership dynamics, is that it shows you how to “do more with
less” while increasing the engagement of employees and staff. But,
there’s the trick. To win contracts, it is people being creative,
working together to figure out how to “do more with less” and then
translating that value to the customer.
- The Monte Carlo simulation is about catalyzing those people focused
attributes through discovering the “low hanging fruit” that will propel
you company to the next level of success, winning more contracts and
completing them more profitably.
- Contact us to
receive your 6 key questions - it's straightforward and eye-opening!
How successful has this
approach been with other
companies?
- The analysis, methodology and metrics have been used successfully for the last three decades. Please see our testimonials and case studies
for more detail. Incorporating this approach and metrics into a Monte
Carlo simulation is something we were able to accomplish over the last
year.
- Our company lead the statistical benefits analysis, which included a
Monte Carlo simulation review, for a very
large DoD government installation of an SAP/ERP system being implemented throughout the country.
We were the principle contractor, representing this government
organization, to analyze the use of a Monte Carlo
simulation to estimate Full Time Equivalent (FTE) savings and schedule
reduction. We were commended for our work and this inspired us to do a customer simulation specific to
profit, time-to-market and contract award.
-
The results of the simulation can be quite
revealing, leaving many people wanting to dig deeper.
All simulation results can be easily traced back to your
answers so you understand how, based on your success criteria, you can
reliably achieve increased profits, reduced time-to-market and be able
to win more contracts.
- Contact us to receive
your six key questions - it's straightforward and eye-opening!
| |